Monday, November 27, 2006

Holiday Open House

We would like to extend an invitation to everyone in the area to come to our Holiday Open House!

Saturday December 9th from Noon until 6 pm

There will be food and beverages as well as thoughtful and heartfelt handmade gifts for the entire family.

So come over, have some great food and enjoy a calm and peaceful holiday shopping experience!

We look forward to meeting you!

1817 Brown School Rd
Saint Joseph, MI

269-932-4551

Peace and Light,

Maria, Bob and Sofia

Monday, November 20, 2006

Thanksgiving Vacation

Just a quick note to let everyone know that I will be out of town until November 25th. I can still be reached at my toll free number 866-lotusbody (568-8726) and I will still be checking my e mail. Please leave a message and we will get back to you!
Happy Thanksgiving!

Peace and Light,

Maria, Bob and Sofia

Saturday, November 04, 2006

Love the Skin You're In!

Most of us are pretty conscious when it comes to what foods we choose to put into our mouths. We like to think that we usually make the best choice with the occasional not so healthy snack. But how much thought do any of us give to what we take into our bodies via our skin? The skin is our largest organ and it is responsible for many functions.

1. Protection of underlying organs and tissues from mechanical damage.
2. Excretion of excess salts, water and urea from the body.
3. Temperature regulation.
4. Maintenance of body shape. The elasticity of skin restores the shape when joints are used during movement.
5. Protection against excessive loss of water from the body by evaporation.
6. Protection against entry of harmful organisms.
7. Storage of nutrients.
8. Detection of stimuli such as temperature, pain and touch and the relay of this information to the nervous system. And last but most important:
9. Absorption.

In fact, we absorb 70% of what our skin comes into contact with both indirectly through the environment and directly through application to the skin of various lotions, cosmetics and medications. 70%! That is a lot especially when you consider the pathway. When we eat and drink, the foods we take in have to go through the gastrointestinal tract before entering our bloodstream to reach the entire body. What this means is that your food is in contact with digestive enzymes, stomach acids and other substances that break down and help to digest and process it. If there are any toxic or un-needed elements they are often whisked away to the liver and kidneys for processing and excretion.

This doesn’t mean that there are no ill effects from eating things that are not good for us; it just means that our foods get broken down and partially processed. In contrast, when we put a substance on our skin, it gets absorbed and into the bloodstream without the benefit of processing and filtering.

This is how trans-dermal patches work for nicotine, pain killers like morphine and hormones for HRT. The fat-soluble medications are absorbed through the fat layer and into the bloodstream to the entire body, instantly. Then there are the medicated creams and lotions on the market for sore muscles and arthritis. These ingredients, salicylates/aspirins and hot pepper (capsaicin) preparations are water-soluble so they need help getting through the fatty tissue to get into the bloodstream. That is where the other various ingredients come into play, the ones that we usually cannot pronounce. The most popular transport agent is propylene glycol. It is responsible for vasodilation (opening up your blood vessels) and dilating your pores so that the medicine can get through.

There are a few problems with this method that you need to be aware of.

1. Propylene glycol is a petroleum by product.
2. It is an ingredient in anti-freeze and other industrial agents.
3. The FDA considers it so toxic that it requires its workers to wear full body protection when cleaning up a spill, yet it is the most common ingredient in all cosmetics.
4. When the propylene glycol opens the door for the medicine, everything else follows.

What that means is that all of the delightful formaldehyde based preservatives, petroleum, synthetic fragrances and Goddess knows what else, are escorted right into your bloodstream for quick distribution.

Isn’t that nice? And we haven’t even talked about cosmetics yet!

Read the ingredient label on any random body product and then ask yourself,

“Would I feed this to my child?” “Would I eat this myself?” Yes, with your mouth.

If you cringe, then maybe you need to rethink what you are slathering on your children and your own body everyday because that is exactly what you are doing. You are eating all the formaldehyde, all of the petroleum, all of the propylene glycol, all of the dyes and synthetic fragrances, all of the ingredients that you cannot pronounce, all of it. YUCK!

And I am sorry to say that many of the products labeled as “organic” are not much better. Remember, if the scent of a product lasts on your skin for more than 20 minutes, it is synthetic. It is not real. The exception to this is resinous oils like frankincense and patchouli etc.
In light of this information we are considering starting a new slogan, Lotus Body Botanicals, Good Enough to Eat! Check out our entire line of edible skin care/healing products, (except of course the Honey Bubbles)!

Peace and Light,
Maria

Don't Blame the Spinach!

What a Preedickamink
By Doug Hornig "That's what Popeye would surely say: "What a preedickamink!"

All those years of pouring spinach down his gullet in order to build a strong body, and now he'd be hard pressed to find a supply.

The culprit is, of course, that old devil, the Escherichia coli bacterium. It seems like every time there's a nationwide brouhaha over contaminated food, E. coli is at the center of it, and that's certainly the case here. Since August 25, when the first case of illness was reported, anti-spinach fever--promoted by the government and fed by the sensation-seeking media--has risen to a near hysterical pitch.

By mid-September, the FDA had cleared the supermarkets of all bagged fresh spinach after some 150 infections and one death that could be attributed to the "outbreak" of E. coli-related illness.

Dire warnings were issued, among others from Robert Brackett--director of the FDA's Center for Food Safety and Nutrition--who stressed the importance of stopping the bacterium at its source. "If you wash it, it is not going to get rid of it," he said.

Placing his job at the very pinnacle of stewardship of the public safety (though struggling with his syntax), Dr. Andrew von Eschenbach, the FDA's acting commissioner proclaimed that, "We need to strive to do even better so even one life is not lost."

With many frightened citizens vowing never to touch spinach again, there has even been talk in Washington about a permanent ban on all bagged, fresh-picked, triple-washed greens.

Our regular readers will be aware, however, that we are eternally skeptical when the government says it is doing something for our own good, and so we decided to take a closer look at the spinach fear that has suddenly gripped the land. Was it justified, or was it an overreaction engineered, once again, by those zealous guardians of our welfare down in D.C.?

Well, you be the judge.

There are several important aspects of the story to keep in mind. First of all, hundreds of strains of E. coli bacteria already reside in your gut. In fact, you wouldn't have intestinal health without them. They're the good guys.

Unfortunately, they have a handful of cousins that can cause foodborne illnesses, and one--O157:H7--that is particularly toxic, and is responsible for most of the serious medical conditions associated with the bacterium.

Even if you do ingest the nasty O157:H7, however, you won't automatically get sick. As our old friend, nutritional consultant Jon Barron put it, "those with healthy populations of beneficial bacteria in their intestinal tracts are virtually immune to problems. There is simply no room for ingested E. coli to take root, colonize, and multiply--not to mention the fact that the beneficial bacteria gobble up any stray E. coli they encounter. In other words, the outbreak has less to do with contaminated food than it does with the epidemic of compromised immune systems and intestinal tracts."

This is why, even when we ingest O157:H7-contaminated food, the resultant illness will probably be self-limiting. The vast majority of those exposed are either unaffected, or have minor problems that clear up in one to three days. Only in about 5% of all cases is there severe poisoning.

Thus, if you don't take care of yourself, you're more likely to fall ill and run a greater risk of complications. Not a great surprise. And equally unsurprising is the behavior of government, which has been handed a golden opportunity to educate people about the importance of gastrointestinal health. Instead, our bureaucrats choose to disrupt the food business, bankrupting farmers along the way, all in a futile attempt to eliminate O157:H7 from the retail world.

Naturally, we are not advocating that contaminated food shouldn't be pulled from stores. It should. We're just adding some perspective to the Great Spinach Flap of '06. Here's some more: each year, E. coli poisoning causes 73,000 cases of serious illness and about 60 deaths. Yes, the proverbial bolt of lightning is more likely to take your life than this tiny animalcule; and yes, 150 cases/1 death is a tiny percentage of the whole.

There's also another thing worth considering, the question of who benefits. From the Union of Concerned Scientists' Food and Environment website we learn that, "Most infections of E. coli O157:H7 come from eating undercooked, contaminated ground beef. Meat becomes contaminated in the slaughterhouse, and the bacteria are easily spread when meat is ground in the processing plant. Studies have shown that about half the cattle in feedlots carry this pathogen during summer months." Worse yet, because of the willy-nilly use of antibiotics among modern herds, the strain borne by beef cattle is increasingly antibiotic-resistant.

Now the target of the spinach purge has been organically raised produce, at a time when it is claiming a bourgeoning segment of the market. Conventional growers, as well as the powerful beef industry, have plenty of friends in Washington. Since large agribusinesses have a vested interest in maintaining their own market share, while meat processors would rather we knew as little as possible about where our hamburger comes from, having organic vegetables transformed into a villain is welcome news to both."

Michigan's Raw Milk Fiasco!

October 30, 2006
Quick! Confiscate the Butter!
State sting asserts Michigan milk laws, chills farmers
By Patty Cantrell
Great Lakes Bulletin News Service

MLUI
Growing onsumer demand for fresh, unprocessed milk from happy cows runs up against regulations designed for big business and long distance.
For three years now, southwest Michigan farmers Richard and Annette Hebron have kept their family operation in business with weekly deliveries of fresh, un-pasteurized milk and other farm products direct to some 150 members of their Family Farms Cooperative in Ann Arbor.

And, for three years, regulators at the Michigan Department of Agriculture left the Hebrons-and a growing number of other small farmers who also produce and sell raw milk-alone. The reason is that, even though Michigan law requires that all milk sold at retail be pasteurized as a precaution against food borne illnesses, the raw milk the Hebrons provide with two other farms in the cooperative is not really sold that way. Customers buy shares in the cows that produce the milk, which qualifies them for an exemption in Michigan's dairy law: People who own cows can drink their own cows' un-pasteurized milk.

This legal truce between the MDA and such "cow-share" arrangements ended abruptly, however, on Friday Oct. 13, when state troopers stopped Richard Hebron on his way to Ann Arbor and produced a search warrant that allowed state agents to seize Mr. Hebron's products, paperwork, and cell phone.

As the alarmed farmer watched the officials confiscate the privately contracted, un-pasteurized milk, buttermilk, yogurt, kefir, and butter, his wife, Annette, was enduring the same thing back home. There, plainclothes agents were packing up other products, taping shut freezers and coolers, and confiscating the family's computer and business records.

Four hours later, in Ann Arbor, police and other MDA Food and Dairy Division officials produced a third warrant and searched the warehouse of a store that the cooperative uses as a distribution point for its products.

What Is Retail?
Katherine Fedder is the MDA official who approved the sting operation, which included months of undercover work by a spy from her agency, who infliltrated the co-op. She said that her department's concern is not about cow shares but about location. Delivering to the warehouse of a specialty wine and food shop in Ann Arbor, she contends, may violate the state's dairy laws because it is a matter of bringing un-pasteurized, unlabeled milk to a licensed retail establishment.

But Mr. Hebron and the store owner say this warehouse space is well away from the store's retail traffic and that, lacking any clarifying language in Michigan law, they thought it was perfectly legal to make the privately owned, un-pasteurized milk products available to co-op members there.

Ms. Fedder takes issue with the negative reaction to the sting by the press and others, which have described it as "Gestapo-like." But if the suddenness and severity of the MDA's Friday-the-13th raids don't qualify for jackboot status, they certainly are a wake-up call to entrepreneurial farms and their direct-market customers.

Local farm-to-table enterprises like Mr. Hebron's are revolutionizing food markets by responding to new consumer demands. They are springing up like wild, untamable mint outside the typical, centralized, national and international channels that most food now travels: Nearly every morsel averages 800 to 1,200 miles before reaching our plates.

"Cow share" arrangements like that of the Family Farms Cooperative are increasing because a growing number of consumers like raw milk's taste, its reported and perceived nutrition and digestibility benefits, and the simple fact that it comes direct from smaller, nearby farms.

But the entrepreneurial spirit re-connecting these local farms and consumers is also challenging the normal regulatory course of business at the MDA, which is charged with enforcing public health rules designed, in this case, to keep the mass-market milk supply safe.

Communication Breakdown?
The ordeal has left the Hebrons and their two partner farm families traumatized, confused, and struggling to stay in business. Two weeks after the search and seizure, the Hebrons had yet to be charged with a crime, were waiting for news, and trying to soldier on without access to seized equipment and records.

A simple warning call from the MDA could have alleviated the agency's concerns, said Mr. Hebron. "They could have come in and talked to us about it and we could have rectified the situation."

The MDA's choice of a sting operation raises an urgent question: How willing is the MDA to explore other ways to protect consumers and regulate farmers who are, in this case, buying and selling milk products that they prefer over what is available in mainstream stores? In other words, are state regulators willing to consider alternatives to regulatory rules written primarily for big business and long distances?

The agency's treatment of the Hebron's also is drawing criticism because it conflicts with the agency's long-espoused commitment to helping farmers understand and comply with regulations. The sting stands in stark contrast to the MDA's kid-glove treatment of some large livestock operations, such as the 2,500-cow dairies that now dominate the mainstream, industrial milk market, which the Hebron's customers are deserting. Despite repeated complaints from neighbors and well-documented evidence of severe water pollution, livestock operations suspected of violating environmental laws generally receive months and even years of warnings before the state takes enforcement action.

In an interview with the Great Lakes Bulletin News Service, the MDA's Ms. Fedder declined to say whether officials attempted to communicate with the Hebrons before the raids. She did confirm, however, that her division assigned an undercover agent to the cooperative last spring. This came after a local health department, apparently in the Hebron's vicinity, reported in April that two children had become ill after allegedly consuming raw milk. Ms. Fedder also confirmed the facts in an Oct. 19 Business Week commentary: The local health department was unable to trace the illness back to raw milk or any other specific food.

Despite the lack of evidence that the Hebron's milk was related to any public health harm, the undercover operation proceeded and evolved months later into the sudden sting operation.

Rights and Responsibilities
Ms. Fedder insisted that the MDA respects private consumer choice and tolerates cow-share arrangements because the law says nothing about them: Her concern is about raw milk showing up in retail stores as demand for it rises.

"That's where we will draw the line," she said. "My biggest concern has always been a mother who goes into the store and grabs something she didn't intend to grab versus a person with a high degree of knowledge of what they're consuming and the choice they're making."

Ms. Fedder points to the majority of public health officials, who advise people not to drink raw milk. Mainstream milk producers also repeat this point in a campaign they have launched to defend the industry's practices and processes-and to discredit and oppose the labeling of raw milk, organic milk, and milk from cows that have not been fed artificial hormones or daily doses of antibiotics.

Yet, ironically, food safety is a major factor in the rise of un-pasteurized milk providers, up from just a few known Michigan providers in 2003 to nearly 30 today, according to realmilk.com, a project of the Weston A. Price Foundation, which promotes the benefits of raw or un-pasteurized dairy products.

Raw milk consumers like the fact that they're working with, and helping keep in business, small farmers who may be needed to keep the milk supply safe and secure in a time when more and more food is coming through increasingly consolidated, sometimes quite vulnerable channels.

A recent New York Times piece by author and researcher Michael Pollan pointed out, for example, that 80 percent of America's beef is now slaughtered by just four companies, 75 percent of precut salads are processed by two companies, and 30 percent of milk by just one. The recent national recall of bagged spinach demonstrates how one small problem along America's mass food production line can cause lots of damage.

Katherine Czapp, a member of the Family Farms Cooperative, believes Michigan regulators need to take such facts into consideration and give consumers and farmers more security and clarity in their efforts to exchange the food products they prefer.

"I think they need to look at places like California, where it is legal to buy raw milk off the shelf, or Pennsylvania," said Ms. Czapp, who is also editor of the Wise Traditions Journal, a publication of the Weston A. Price Foundation. "Let's see what they did there to make that legally possible."

Patty Cantrell directs the Michigan Land Use Institute's entrepreneurial agriculture program. Reach her at patty@mlui.org.